Who decides whether a sentence is concurrent or consecutive

In other words, the jury must decide whether the sentences should run consecutively or concurrently.Consecutively (one after the other).Judges may select concurrent sentencing out of mercy, plea bargaining, or other reasons.On probation at the time of the new offense;These guidelines provide that is the statutory maximum sentence is less than the minimum in.

A concurrent sentence is almost always preferable to a consecutive sentence because it allows individuals to get out of jail or prison quicker.The decision can come up when the defendant is convicted of multiple offenses in the same case (see example 1, below);In the interest of reducing jail overcrowding and the costs associated with housing inmates, many judges have to decide whether to run your sentences concurrently or consecutively.Or when the defendant is already serving time for a conviction but is tried later.According to the 18 usc § 3553 (a) and (b) and 3584, district courts have the right to use discretion when imposing concurrent or consecutive sentences.

People v sawyer, 410 mich 531, 534 (1981).The opposite of a concurrent sentence is a consecutive sentence.According to the supreme court case oregon v.31) it may also be noted that merely because the sentences are to run consecutively, and the aggregate punishment is in excess of the punishment which the court is competent to inflict.On parole at the time of the new offense

A consecutive sentence is when jail terms run one after the other.The issue is whether this case falls within such parameters.The trial chamber shall indicate whether multiple sentences shall be served consecutively or concurrently.